Oral tradition, volume 14, number 2 (October 1999)
https://hdl.handle.net/10355/63728
2024-03-28T13:18:30ZAbout the authors (Oral Tradition, 14/2, 1999)
https://hdl.handle.net/10355/64785
About the authors (Oral Tradition, 14/2, 1999)
1999-10-01T00:00:00ZAh ain't heard whut de tex' wuz : the (il)legitimate textuality of Old English and Black English
https://hdl.handle.net/10355/64788
Ah ain't heard whut de tex' wuz : the (il)legitimate textuality of Old English and Black English
Saenger, Michael
In this essay I examine two texts from radically different cultural situations: Anglo-Saxon monasteries and the rural Black South. Nevertheless, their respective provenance--in terms of speaker, reporter and legitimizing institution--bear intriguing similarities. Each text is concerned with the biography of the oral poet and issues of transcribing his orality.//, quotation marks removed from title to ensure alphabetical order. Difference as follows; "Ah ain't heard whut de tex' wuz": The (Il)legitimate
Textuality of Old English and Black English
1999-10-01T00:00:00ZCover (Oral Tradition, 14/2, 1999)
https://hdl.handle.net/10355/64782
Cover (Oral Tradition, 14/2, 1999)
1999-10-01T00:00:00ZEditor's column (Oral Tradition, 14/2 (1999)
https://hdl.handle.net/10355/64787
Editor's column (Oral Tradition, 14/2 (1999)
Foley, John Miles
With the present issue Oral Tradition returns to its more common--and in many ways most fundamental--format: a digest of articles on a widevariety of traditions and expressive forms. The rationale for this diversity stems from our editorial commitment to study oral tradition comparatively, to learn more about our "home fields" by juxtaposing verbal arts from all over the world and throughout history.; Note
1999-10-01T00:00:00Z