Brute Luck, Option Luck, And Equality Of Initial Opportunities

MOspace/Manakin Repository

Breadcrumbs Navigation

Brute Luck, Option Luck, And Equality Of Initial Opportunities

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/10022

[+] show full item record


Title: Brute Luck, Option Luck, And Equality Of Initial Opportunities
Author: Vallentyne, Peter
Keywords: egalitarianism
brute luck
Date: 2002-04
Publisher: University of Chicago
Citation: Ethics 112 (April 2002): 529-557
Abstract: In the old days, material egalitarians tended to favor equality of outcome advantage, on some suitable conception of advantage (happiness, resources, etc.). Under the influence of Dworkin's seminal articles on equality , contemporary material egalitarians have tended to favor equality of brute luck advantage—on the grounds that this permits people to be held appropriately accountable for the benefits and burdens of their choices. I shall argue, however, that a plausible conception of egalitarian justice requires neither that brute luck advantage always be equalized nor that people always bear the full cost of their voluntary choices. Instead, justice requires that initial opportunities for advantage be equalized—roughly along the lines suggested by Arneson and Cohen. Brute luck egalitarianism and initial opportunity egalitarianism are fairly similar in motivation, and as a result they have not been adequately distinguished. Once the two views are more clearly contrasted, equality of opportunity for advantage will, I claim, be seen to be a more plausible conception of equality.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/10022
ISSN: 0014-1704

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophy publications (MU) [74]
    The items in this collection are the scholarly output of the faculty, staff, and students of the Department of Philosophy.

[+] show full item record