[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVallentyne, Petereng
dc.description.abstractLeft-libertarianism, like the more familiar right-libertarianism, holds that agents initially fully own themselves. Unlike right-libertarianism, however, it views natural resources as belonging to everyone in some egalitarian manner. Left-libertarianism is thus a form of liberal egalitarianism. In this article, I shall lay out the reasons why (1) left-libertarianism holds that (a) private discrimination is not intrinsically unjust and (b) it is intrinsically unjust for the state to prohibit private discrimination, and (2) that, nonetheless, a plausible version of left-libertarianism holds that it is unjust for the state (and many private individuals) to take no steps to offset the negative effects of systematic private discrimination. The basic line is not new. It is simply that there is nothing unjust in principle with private discrimination, but there is (at least typically) something unjust about doing nothing to promote equal life prospects.eng
dc.identifier.citationSan Diego Law Review 43:981-994eng
dc.publisherUniversity of San Diego School of Laweng
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophy publicationseng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. College of Arts and Sciences. Department of Philosophyeng
dc.subjectliberal egalitarianismeng
dc.subjectprivate discriminationeng
dc.subject.lcshLibertarianism -- Philosophyeng
dc.subject.lcshDiscrimination -- Philosophyeng
dc.subject.lcshValues -- Social aspectseng
dc.subject.lcshEquality -- Philosophyeng
dc.titleLeft-Libertarianism and Private Discriminationeng

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophy publications (MU)
    The items in this collection are the scholarly output of the faculty, staff, and students of the Department of Philosophy.

[-] Show simple item record