On the possibility of nonaggregative priority for the worst off.

MOspace/Manakin Repository

Breadcrumbs Navigation

On the possibility of nonaggregative priority for the worst off.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/10071

[+] show full item record


Title: On the possibility of nonaggregative priority for the worst off.
Author: Fleurbaey, Marc; Tungodden, Bertil; Vallentyne, Peter
Keywords: utilitarianism
normative ethics
Date: 2008-11-24
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Citation: Social Philosophy and Policy (2009), 26: 258-285
Abstract: We shall focus on moral theories that are solely concerned with promoting the benefits (e.g., well-being) of individuals and shall explore the possibility of such theories' ascribing some priority to benefits to those who are worse off—without this priority being absolute. Utilitarianism (which evaluates alternatives on the basis of total or average benefits) ascribes no priority to the worse off, and leximin (which evaluates alternatives by giving lexical priority to the worst off, and then the second worst off, and so on) ascribes absolute priority to the worse off (i.e., favors even a very small benefit to a worse-off person over very large benefits to large numbers of better-off people). Neither extreme view, we assume, is plausible.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/10071
ISSN: 0265-0525

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophy publications (MU) [74]
    The items in this collection are the scholarly output of the faculty, staff, and students of the Department of Philosophy.

[+] show full item record