[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVallentyne, Petereng
dc.date.issued2009eng
dc.descriptionhttp://klinechair.missouri.edu/on-line%20papers/sen%20on%20sufficiency.doceng
dc.description.abstractI present a critical survey of Sen's work, and related work by others, on certain distribution-sensitive principles of justice. More specifically, I discuss three kinds of such principles: (1) sufficientarian principles, which require promoting the adequacy of individual benefits (non-poverty), (2) prioritarian principles, which require the promotion of individual benefits but with some kind of priority for the worse off, and (3) egalitarian principles, which require the promotion of equality of benefits. The focus is on presenting the issues and results in an intuitively accessible manner that highlights its importance for existing philosophical debates on the topic. Critical comments are only suggestive rather than fully defended.eng
dc.identifier.citationAmartya Sen. ed. Christopher W. Morris. Cambridge University Press, 2009. 138-169. Print.eng
dc.identifier.isbn9780521852913eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/10087eng
dc.publisherCambridge University Presseng
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophy publicationseng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. College of Arts and Sciences. Department of Philosophyeng
dc.subjectAmartya Seneng
dc.subject.lcshDistributive justice -- Philosophyeng
dc.subject.lcshEquality -- Philosophyeng
dc.subject.lcshPriority (Philosophy)eng
dc.titleSen on Sufficiency, Priority, and Equalityeng
dc.typeBook chaptereng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophy publications (MU)
    The items in this collection are the scholarly output of the faculty, staff, and students of the Department of Philosophy.

[-] Show simple item record