[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVallentyne, Petereng
dc.date.issued2005eng
dc.descriptionhttp://klinechair.missouri.edu/on-line%20papers/Capabilities%20vs%20opporutnitiesdoc.doc Also found in the book Capabilities Equality. ed. Alexander Kaufman. New York: Routledge, 2006. ISBN 9780415360555eng
dc.description.abstractAmartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum have argued that justice is concerned, at least in part, with the distribution of capabilities (opportunities to function). Richard Arneson, G.A. Cohen, and John Roemer have argued that justice is concerned with something like the distribution of opportunities for well-being. I argue that, although some versions of the capability view are incompatible with some versions of the opportunity for well-being view, the most plausible version of the capability view is identical to a slight generalization of the opportunity for well-being view.eng
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Political Philosophy 13 (2005): 359-371.eng
dc.identifier.issn0963-8016eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/10200eng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwelleng
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophy publicationseng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. College of Arts and Sciences. Department of Philosophyeng
dc.subjectcapabilityeng
dc.subjectjusticeeng
dc.subjectsocial and political philosophyeng
dc.titleCapabilities vs. Opportunities for Well-beingeng
dc.typeArticleeng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophy publications (MU)
    The items in this collection are the scholarly output of the faculty, staff, and students of the Department of Philosophy.

[-] Show simple item record