Contextualism and Intellectualism

MOspace/Manakin Repository

Breadcrumbs Navigation

Contextualism and Intellectualism

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/10466

[-] show simple item record

dc.contributor.author McGrath, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned 2011-04-14T18:49:54Z
dc.date.available 2011-04-14T18:49:54Z
dc.date.issued 0000
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10355/10466
dc.description This is a preprint of an article published in Philosophical Perspectives, Volume 24, Issue 1, pages 383-405, December 2010. The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com doi: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00197.x en_US
dc.description.abstract The main goal of this paper is to show that the common ground between Jason Stanley and Keith DeRose concerning contextualism against subject-sensitive invariantism, which is assumed in the literature generally, is a false assumption. If I am right about this, then one of the main motivations for accepting contextualism over SSI is undermined. This might seem to be good news for SSI. However, other key test cases provide motivations for contextualism, even once intellectualism is abandoned. In fact, I will argue that anti-intellectualist contextualism is not merely a coherent possibility but that it has distinct advantages over SSI. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Philosophy publications en_US
dc.subject epistemic positions en_US
dc.subject belief en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Knowledge, Theory of en_US
dc.title Contextualism and Intellectualism en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.relation.ispartofcommunity University of Missouri-Columbia. College of Arts and Sciences. Department of Philosophy


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophy publications (MU) [74]
    The items in this collection are the scholarly output of the faculty, staff, and students of the Department of Philosophy.

[-] show simple item record