[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorShang, Yi, 1967-eng
dc.contributor.authorVantasin, Kittinun, 1984-eng
dc.date.issued2010eng
dc.date.submitted2010 Falleng
dc.descriptionTitle from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on April 6, 2011).eng
dc.descriptionThe entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.eng
dc.descriptionThesis advisor: Dr. Yi Shang.eng
dc.descriptionM.S. University of Missouri--Columbia 2010.eng
dc.description.abstractTwo of the essential tasks in protein tertiary structure prediction are predicting quality and selecting the best quality model from given model structures. Finding solutions to these problems are fundamental to understanding the nature of proteins and advancing in protein research area. In this thesis, we present efficient algorithms that tackle both problems effectively. The algorithms are developed on the well-known consensus-based idea that has been continuously successful since CASP6. For assessing the quality of structures, we develop several new methods based on the idea of removing redundant structures and outliers. The algorithms aims at finding suitable reference sets in computing the consensus-score in order to improve the existing algorithms. The methods can use any suitable pair-wise similarity measurement between a pair of models such as GDT-TS and Q score. We also develop a very efficient method for computing Q score for large size problem. In our experimental results, the algorithms are applied to CASP8 dataset and have achieved the superior performance over existing state-of-the-art methods including the top1 method in the QA category of CASP8. For the selecting the best model structure, our new methods are effective and perform better than other best-performing scoring functions by up to 7.6% based on the actual GDT-TS of top1 selected model to the native structure. The selection result is obtained by our method using Q score are slightly worse than those obtained using GDT-TS, but using pair-wise Q score method is in general about 15 times faster than using pair-wise GDT-TS method.eng
dc.description.bibrefIncludes bibliographical references.eng
dc.format.extentxii, 75 pageseng
dc.identifier.merlinb82193423eng
dc.identifier.oclc714118999eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/10570
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32469/10355/10570eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertations. Theses. 2010 Theseseng
dc.rightsOpenAccess.eng
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
dc.subject.lcshProteins -- Structure-activity relationships -- Mathematical modelseng
dc.subject.lcshProtein engineeringeng
dc.subject.lcshLigands (Biochemistry)eng
dc.subject.lcshAlgorithmseng
dc.titleNew consensus-based algorithms for quality assessment in protein structure predictioneng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplineComputer science (MU)eng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
thesis.degree.levelMasterseng
thesis.degree.nameM.S.eng


Files in this item

[PDF]
[PDF]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record