Preserving the intellectual output & resources of the University of Missouri.
Scientists vs. journalists?: obligations, risks and benefits of communicating science to the public
MOspace/Manakin Repository
Breadcrumbs Navigation
Scientists vs. journalists?: obligations, risks and benefits of communicating science to the public
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/10641
| Title: | Scientists vs. journalists?: obligations, risks and benefits of communicating science to the public |
| Author: | Beerman, Daniel; Allen, William, 1952- |
| Keywords: |
interdisciplinary collaboration
communication |
| Date: | 2011 |
| Abstract: | Scientists, for many reasons, aren't always the best communicators. Yet, communication skills are vital when informing the public about new research and scientific developments. This process involves scientists, the public and the media institutions through which they connect. The relationship between these groups is a subject of many studies and discussions. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10355/10641 |
Items in MOspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Biochemistry presentations (MU) [7]
The items in this collection are the scholarly output of the faculty, staff, and students of the Division of Biochemistry. -
Biochemistry presentations (MU) [4]
The items in this collection are the scholarly output of the faculty, staff, and students of the Department of Biochemistry.