Scientists vs. journalists?: obligations, risks and benefits of communicating science to the public

MOspace/Manakin Repository

Breadcrumbs Navigation

Scientists vs. journalists?: obligations, risks and benefits of communicating science to the public

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/10641

[-] show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Beerman, Daniel
dc.contributor.author Allen, William, 1952-
dc.date.accessioned 2011-05-05T13:14:40Z
dc.date.available 2011-05-05T13:14:40Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10355/10641
dc.description.abstract Scientists, for many reasons, aren't always the best communicators. Yet, communication skills are vital when informing the public about new research and scientific developments. This process involves scientists, the public and the media institutions through which they connect. The relationship between these groups is a subject of many studies and discussions. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.source.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10355/10641
dc.subject interdisciplinary collaboration en_US
dc.subject communication en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Communication in science
dc.title Scientists vs. journalists?: obligations, risks and benefits of communicating science to the public en_US
dc.type Other en_US
dc.relation.ispartofcommunity University of Missouri-Columbia. College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources. Division of Biochemistry.
dc.relation.ispartofcollection Biochemistry presentations


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Biochemistry presentations (MU) [7]
    The items in this collection are the scholarly output of the faculty, staff, and students of the Division of Biochemistry.
  • Biochemistry presentations (MU) [4]
    The items in this collection are the scholarly output of the faculty, staff, and students of the Department of Biochemistry.

[-] show simple item record