Explicating journalism-as-a-conversation: two experimental tests of online news

MOspace/Manakin Repository

Breadcrumbs Navigation

Explicating journalism-as-a-conversation: two experimental tests of online news

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/10768

[+] show full item record


Title: Explicating journalism-as-a-conversation: two experimental tests of online news
Author: Marchionni, Doreen Marie
Date: 2009
Publisher: University of Missouri--Columbia
Abstract: The concept of journalism as a conversation has been richly explored in descriptive studies for decades. Largely missing from the literature, though, are clear operationalizations that allow theory building for purposes of explanation and prediction. Using Steven Chaffee's articulation of concept-explication as a guide, this dissertation conducted a pair of online news experiments to measure the concept, tracing it in literatures as varied as political communication and computer-network analysis, often as an embedded concept. The first experiment tested whether readers perceive conversational stories as different from traditional stories and as more credible and expert. The second tested types of journalistic conversation on these outcomes. Findings suggest the conversational features coorientation/homophily and interactivity are key, not only in distinguishing this type of news but in predicting its perceived credibility and expertise.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/10768
Other Identifiers: MarchionniD-110609-D62

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[+] show full item record