[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPigg, Kenneth E.eng
dc.contributor.authorKhatiwada, Lila Kumar, 1969-eng
dc.coverage.spatialUnited Stateseng
dc.coverage.temporal1981-2001eng
dc.coverage.temporal2001-2009eng
dc.date.issued2010eng
dc.date.submitted2010 Springeng
dc.descriptionTitle from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on October 22, 2010).eng
dc.descriptionThe entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.eng
dc.descriptionDissertation advisor: Dr. Kenneth E. Pigg.eng
dc.descriptionVita.eng
dc.descriptionPh. D. University of Missouri--Columbia 2010.eng
dc.description.abstract[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT REQUEST OF AUTHOR.] Prosperity is often associated with income. This study goes beyond the economic determinant of prosperity and develops a prosperity index by using indicators of education, employment, housing occupancy, and poverty status for all contiguous U.S. counties and non-metro counties. A spatial approach has been used to analyze the data as the data was spatially distributed. Using OLS, spatial lag, and spatial error methods, three models were developed and compared. Spatial error model explained higher percent of variation among three models. Labor markets variables were found to be important predictors of prosperity in all-counties and non-metro counties. The results showed that high prosperous counties had higher economic opportunities, higher urban influence, higher social capital, lower income inequality, lower percent of minority population, higher percent of employed female population, higher civic agricultural activities, lower percent of people working in low paying service sectors, and more jobs in manufacturing sectors. A major contribution of this study to sociology is that spatial effect should be taken into consideration while dealing with spatially correlated data.eng
dc.description.bibrefIncludes bibliographical references.eng
dc.format.extentvii, 170 pageseng
dc.identifier.merlinb82635031eng
dc.identifier.oclc733760920eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/10920
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32469/10355/10920eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertationseng
dc.rightsAccess is limited to the campuses of the University of Missouri.eng
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
dc.subject.lcshPoverty -- United States -- Statisticseng
dc.subject.lcshIncome distribution -- United States -- Statisticseng
dc.subject.lcshSpatial analysis (Statistics)eng
dc.subject.lcshUnited States -- Economic conditions -- 1981-2001 -- Regional disparitieseng
dc.subject.lcshUnited States -- Economic conditions -- 2001-2009 -- Regional disparitieseng
dc.titleSpatial analysis of poverty and prosperity in the U.S. countieseng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplineRural sociology (MU)eng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
thesis.degree.levelDoctoraleng
thesis.degree.namePh. D.eng


Files in this item

[PDF]
[PDF]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record