Shared more. Cited more. Safe forever.
    • advanced search
    • submit works
    • about
    • help
    • contact us
    • login
    View Item 
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources (MU)
    • Division of Applied Social Sciences (MU)
    • Department of Agricultural Economics (MU)
    • Economics and Management of Agrobiotechnology Center (MU)
    • AgBioForum (Journal)
    • AgBioForum, vol. 08, no. 2 & 3 (2005)
    • View Item
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources (MU)
    • Division of Applied Social Sciences (MU)
    • Department of Agricultural Economics (MU)
    • Economics and Management of Agrobiotechnology Center (MU)
    • AgBioForum (Journal)
    • AgBioForum, vol. 08, no. 2 & 3 (2005)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    advanced searchsubmit worksabouthelpcontact us

    Browse

    All of MOspaceCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis SemesterThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis Semester

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular AuthorsStatistics by Referrer

    Second-Generation GMOs : Where to from Here?

    Jefferson-Moore, Kenrett Y.
    Traxler, Greg (Gregory J.)
    View/Open
    [PDF] Second generation gmos.pdf (217.4Kb)
    Date
    2005
    Format
    Article
    Metadata
    [+] Show full item record
    Abstract
    The driving force behind the growth of the agricultural biotechnology industry is the potential to increase efficiency in the production of commodities and to provide benefits to consumers and producers as well as profits for industry. Value-enhancedh genetically modified crops have the potential to provide new momentum to the industry. Using the US high-oil corn (HOC) industry as a case study, welfare measures indicate that those benefiting from HOC are HOC seed suppliers and conventional seed suppliers. Farmer gains are only attributed to larger premiums at the elevator level without technology fees and monopoly power.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10355/117
    Citation
    AgBioForum, 8(2&3) 2005: 143-150.
    Rights
    OpenAccess.
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
    Collections
    • AgBioForum, vol. 08, no. 2 & 3 (2005)

    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems
     

     


    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems