Shared more. Cited more. Safe forever.
    • advanced search
    • submit works
    • about
    • help
    • contact us
    • login
    View Item 
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources (MU)
    • Division of Applied Social Sciences (MU)
    • Department of Agricultural Economics (MU)
    • Economics and Management of Agrobiotechnology Center (MU)
    • AgBioForum (Journal)
    • AgBioForum, vol. 02, no. 2 (1999)
    • View Item
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources (MU)
    • Division of Applied Social Sciences (MU)
    • Department of Agricultural Economics (MU)
    • Economics and Management of Agrobiotechnology Center (MU)
    • AgBioForum (Journal)
    • AgBioForum, vol. 02, no. 2 (1999)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    advanced searchsubmit worksabouthelpcontact us

    Browse

    All of MOspaceCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis SemesterThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis Semester

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular AuthorsStatistics by Referrer

    The producer benefits of herbicide-resistant canola

    Fulton, Murray E.
    Keyowski, Lynette
    View/Open
    [PDF] Producer benefits of herbicide resistant canola.pdf (34.75Kb)
    Date
    1999
    Format
    Article
    Metadata
    [+] Show full item record
    Abstract
    The commercial sale of herbicide resistant (HR) canola has raised questions about the benefits of this new technology for seed and chemical companies, farmers, consumers, and other players in the supply chain. In this paper, we argue that the pricing and adoption of HR canola in Canada can not be understood if producers are seen as being homogeneous. We develop a conceptual model of producer heterogeneity that represents the distribution of benefits among producers. In this context, some farmers benefit from the new technology leading to adoption, while others do not. Empirical evidence supports this argument. In addition, the new technology co-exists with the traditional technology.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10355/1204
    Citation
    AgBioForum 2(2) 1999: 85-93.
    Rights
    OpenAccess.
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
    Collections
    • AgBioForum, vol. 02, no. 2 (1999)

    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems
     

     


    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems