Shared more. Cited more. Safe forever.
    • advanced search
    • submit works
    • about
    • help
    • contact us
    • login
    View Item 
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • Office of Undergraduate Research (MU)
    • Undergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forum (MU)
    • 2007 Summer Undergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forum (MU)
    • View Item
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • Office of Undergraduate Research (MU)
    • Undergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forum (MU)
    • 2007 Summer Undergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forum (MU)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    advanced searchsubmit worksabouthelpcontact us

    Browse

    All of MOspaceCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis SemesterThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis Semester

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular AuthorsStatistics by Referrer

    International media and economic policy: A comparative media analysis of 2002 U.S. steel tariffs [abstract]

    Mercier, Meghan E.
    Drury, A. Cooper, 1967-
    View/Open
    [PDF] International media and economic policy comparative.pdf (15.25Kb)
    Date
    2007
    Contributor
    University of Missouri-Columbia. Office of Undergraduate Research
    Format
    Presentation
    Metadata
    [+] Show full item record
    Abstract
    This paper compares American and European media coverage of the U.S. Emergency Safeguard Measures for steel which were imposed from March 2002-Dec. 2003 and levied tariffs of up to 30% on some steel imports. Of European Union members, the United Kingdom and France were among the most heavily affected by the tariffs. Mainstream newspapers in those countries presented mainly negative information and opinions of the U.S. policy. There were no significant differences between British and French coverage of this issue. In comparison, U.S. sources were predominantly neutral. However, headlines and prominent articles in all countries often reflected negative attitudes, and the most opinionated language came from journalists themselves, not outside sources, giving quantitative support to theories of chronic press negativity.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10355/1225
    Collections
    • 2007 Summer Undergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forum (MU)

    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems
     

     


    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems