[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Peter W. B.eng
dc.contributor.authorIsaac, Granteng
dc.date.issued1998eng
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the potential impact of both mandatory and voluntary labeling schemes on the research and commercialization of process-based and product-based GMO goods. The analysis concludes that mandatory labeling will impose excessive costs on the producers of GMO. This result would threaten the research and commercialization of GMO goods. In contrast, voluntary positive labeling of GMO-free goods, or of the presence of specific GMO attributes in goods would limit the producer costs. This result would be both commercially and socially optimal. Over the longer term, the labeling issue may diminish in importance when biotechnology is used to develop new product-based GMO goods with desirable attributes rather than simply to reduce costs of production.eng
dc.description.bibrefIncludes bibliographical referenceseng
dc.identifier.citationAgBioForum 1(1) 1998: 25-30.eng
dc.identifier.issn1522-936Xeng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/1391
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherAgBioForumeng
dc.relation.ispartofcollectionAgBioForum, vol. 1, no. 1 (1998)eng
dc.rightsOpenAccess.eng
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
dc.source.urihttp://www.agbioforum.missouri.edu/v1n1/v1n1a07-phillips.htmeng
dc.subjecttransgenic traitseng
dc.subjectrecombinant bovine somatatrophin (rBST)eng
dc.subjecttrade barrierseng
dc.subject.lcshGenetically modified foods -- Labelingeng
dc.titleGMO Labeling : Threat or Opportunity?eng
dc.typeArticleeng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record