van Fraassen and a defense of inference to the best explanation

MOspace/Manakin Repository

Breadcrumbs Navigation

van Fraassen and a defense of inference to the best explanation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/14203

[+] show full item record


Title: van Fraassen and a defense of inference to the best explanation
Author: Finke, Darin
Keywords: Bas van Fraassen
modes of belief
inductive argument
Date: 2011
Publisher: University of Missouri--Columbia
Abstract: Inference to the best explanation (IBE) is an inductive argument type that takes advantage of the fact that explanatory considerations serve as an epistemic guide to believing what is the case. Bas van Fraassen has presented a systematic series of three arguments against the justification of IBE. In this dissertation, I first describe and explain the machinery of IBE and show how the justification and defense of scientific realism is crucially dependent on the justification of IBE. I then carefully analyze and explicate each of van Fraassen's arguments: the argument from the bad lot, the argument from indifference, and the Dutch book argument against IBE. In order, I proceed to argue that each of these arguments fails. Although each of these arguments fails independently of one another, an important part of my overall strategy relies on the existence and tenability of a sufficiently probabilized version of IBE, i.e. a version which combines IBE with Bayesianism.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/14203
Other Identifiers: FinkeD-052011-D10

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[+] show full item record