[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorReys, Robert E.eng
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Daniel J.eng
dc.date.issued2011eng
dc.date.submitted2011 Summereng
dc.description"July 2011"eng
dc.descriptionThe entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.eng
dc.descriptionTitle from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on May 18, 2012).eng
dc.descriptionThesis advisor: Dr. Robert Reyseng
dc.descriptionVita.eng
dc.description.abstractTextbooks play a central role in US mathematics classrooms (Stein, Remillard, & Smith, 2007) and functions are a key topic in secondary mathematics (Carlson, Jacobs, Coe, Larsen, & Hsu, 2002). This study presents results from an analysis of this essential topic in the latest editions of three textbook series: the Glencoe Mathematics series, the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project series, and the Core-Plus Mathematics Project series. In each series, functions were examined in four areas: language used, presence of functions, core features, and ancillary features. Language used in definitions generally indicated univalence, arbitrariness, and universal quantification, but beyond these there was little consistency. Function examples were prevalent in all series. Examples were most often represented with equations or formulas and were predominantly polynomial functions, and especially linear. They mostly appeared in homework exercises and in abstract settings. Most examples were not actually identified as functions, explicit recommendations for using technology with examples were relatively infrequent, and opportunities for students to generate function examples or explore non-examples were limited. All series did include multiple representations of functions with examples, and many examples included verbal descriptions. These findings can provide valuable information for administrators and teachers using or selecting textbooks and curriculum developers as they plan new or revised textbooks. They also serve as an initial stage for research into how curriculum influences student learning of function.eng
dc.description.bibrefIncludes bibliographical references.eng
dc.format.extentxvii, 314 pageseng
dc.identifier.oclc872560546eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32469/10355/14225eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/14225
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertationseng
dc.rightsOpenAccess.eng
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
dc.subjectmathematics curriculumeng
dc.subjecttextbook evaluationeng
dc.subjectfunctions (mathematical)eng
dc.subjectsecondary educationeng
dc.titleFunctions in contemporary secondary mathematics textbook series in the United Stateseng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplineLearning, teaching and curriculum (MU)eng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
thesis.degree.levelDoctoraleng
thesis.degree.namePh. D.eng


Files in this item

[PDF]
[PDF]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record