[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHu, Zhiqiang, 1966-eng
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Zhihuaeng
dc.date.issued2011eng
dc.date.submitted2011 Falleng
dc.descriptionTitle from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on May 29, 2012).eng
dc.descriptionThe entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.eng
dc.descriptionDissertation advisor: Dr. Zhiqiang Hueng
dc.descriptionVita.eng
dc.descriptionPh. D. University of Missouri-Columbia 2011.eng
dc.description"December 2011"eng
dc.description.abstractThe eutrophication problem in US wastewater treatment plants becomes more serious with increasing discharge of nutrients from wastewater to water bodies. The US EPA has required more stringent discharge standards on nutrients for higher effluent water quality. The main objective of this research is to investigate cost-effective and efficient environmental technologies such as membrane bioreactors (MBR) and membrane aerated biofilm reactors (MABR) for improved nitrogen removal and recalcitrant organic nitrogen compounds removal. In this research, the MABR process had demonstrated efficient organic matter and nitrogen removal through simultaneous nitrification and denitrification with low sludge production. The metabolic selection via alternating anoxic/aerobic processes in the modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) type MBR systems resulted in higher bacterial activities and improved nutrient removal than those of integrated fixed-film MBR (IFMBR) systems. The results of a start-up performance study of MBR systems indicated that MBR process configuration and reactor type affect MBR performance, membrane fouling, nutrient removal, and biomass activities. The high biomass MBR systems demonstrated good and stable nitrophenol biodegradation performance with simultaneous nitrogen removal. The membrane flux and TMP profiles suggested that continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) reactor type MBR appeared to have much better membrane fouling control performance than that of the pseudo-plug-flow-reactor type of MLE-MBR due to the difference of metabolic uncoupling by nitrophenol compounds in MBR systems.eng
dc.description.bibrefIncludes bibliographical references.eng
dc.format.extentxi, 111 pageseng
dc.identifier.oclc872560455eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/14419
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32469/10355/14419eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertationseng
dc.rightsOpenAccess.eng
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
dc.subjectwastewater treatmenteng
dc.subjectnitrophenol degredationeng
dc.subjectnutrient removaleng
dc.subjecteutrophicationeng
dc.subjectdischarge standardseng
dc.titleMembrane wastewater treatment processes for improved nutrient removal and degradation of synthetic organic nitrogen compoundseng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplineCivil and Environmental Engineering (MU)eng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
thesis.degree.levelDoctoraleng
thesis.degree.namePh. D.eng


Files in this item

[PDF]
[PDF]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record