[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWhites, LeeAnneng
dc.contributor.authorBeilein, Joseph M.eng
dc.date.issued2012eng
dc.date.submitted2012 Springeng
dc.descriptionTitle from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on September 6, 2012).eng
dc.descriptionThe entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.eng
dc.descriptionDissertation advisor: Dr. LeeAnn Whiteseng
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.eng
dc.descriptionVita.eng
dc.descriptionPh. D. University of Missouri--Columbia 2012.eng
dc.description"May 2012"eng
dc.description.abstract[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] Whereas other scholars see the guerrilla and his flamboyant dress, unmistakable swagger, and unconventional tactics as a sure sign of chaos in war, this work contends that they are outer markers of a distinct masculinity that guided guerrilla warfare. Instead of being herded into the formal armies of the Confederacy and the Union, these young, white, southern-sympathizing men looked to antebellum models of manhood - both southern and western - to retain their independence while defending slavery and their families. Women, full partners in the war effort, produced clothing and food for their men, and provided them with emotional support, all of which allowed the guerrillas to strike out into the brush where they waged a frontier style war. As the war evolved, so too did the gender system that established roles for men and women. Not only did women find themselves performing the tasks of men and standing up to the enemy, but the masculine identity of white men proved to be much more fluid than previously thought. Rather than stubbornly standing their ground, guerrilla-men ran, hid, and avoided confrontations with enemy men only to strike when the backs of Union men were turned. By better understanding these men, we can better understand the war they chose to wage, and hopefully, the nature of war more generally.eng
dc.description.bibrefIncludes bibliographical references.eng
dc.format.extentv, 312 pageseng
dc.identifier.oclc872569499eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32469/10355/15161eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/15161
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertationseng
dc.rightsAccess is limited to the campuses of the University of Missouri.eng
dc.subjectguerrilla warfareeng
dc.subjectgender roleseng
dc.subjectCivil Wareng
dc.titleHousehold war : guerrilla-men, rebel women, and guerilla warfare in Civil War Missourieng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplineHistory (MU)eng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
thesis.degree.levelDoctoraleng
thesis.degree.namePh. D.eng


Files in this item

[PDF]
[PDF]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record