On parents, peers, administrators, and advisers: developing a system to understand self-censorship of controversial topics in the high school press

MOspace/Manakin Repository

Breadcrumbs Navigation

On parents, peers, administrators, and advisers: developing a system to understand self-censorship of controversial topics in the high school press

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/15887

[+] show full item record


Title: On parents, peers, administrators, and advisers: developing a system to understand self-censorship of controversial topics in the high school press
Author: Maksl, Adam M.
Keywords: self-censorship
scholastic journalism
secondary education
freedom of speech
Date: 2012
Publisher: University of Missouri--Columbia
Abstract: Two surveys of young college students (N1=134; N2=372) were used to examine what perceived familial and educational factors influenced former high school journalism students' comfort levels with controversial stories running in the student newspaper. Using theory from developmental psychology, newsroom sociology, communications, and legal studies, this dissertation develops a model for understanding both direct and indirect influences on freedom of expression in the scholastic press. Specifically, results suggest that perceptions of peers' and advisers' comfort with publishing controversial stories influences individual comfort levels. Contrary to suggestions from other scholastic journalism research, former scholastic journalists' perceptions of their principals' opinions were not predictive of individual comfort levels with running controversial stories. Both theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/15887
Other Identifiers: MakslA-071812-D358

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[+] show full item record