dc.contributor.author | Soltysik, Jack | eng |
dc.contributor.author | Webber, David J., 1951- | eng |
dc.contributor.corporatename | University of Missouri-Columbia. Office of Undergraduate Research | eng |
dc.contributor.meetingname | Undergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forum (2007 : University of Missouri--Columbia) | eng |
dc.date | 2007 | eng |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | eng |
dc.description | Abstract only available | eng |
dc.description.abstract | Over the past 30 years, there has been a debate in courts and academia over whether federalism is better protected by judicial or political safeguards. In Garcia v. SAMTA (1985), the Supreme Court ruled that it would not decide 10th Amendment cases and that the political process adequately protects state interests and federalist structure of government. I examine various versions of this thesis advanced by both judges and academics and empirically scrutinize their underlying premises. | eng |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10355/1813 | eng |
dc.language | en_US | eng |
dc.publisher | University of Missouri--Columbia. Office of Undergraduate Research | eng |
dc.relation.ispartof | 2007 Undergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forum (MU) | eng |
dc.relation.ispartofcommunity | University of Missouri-Columbia. Office of Undergraduate Research. Undergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forum | eng |
dc.source.uri | http://undergradresearch.missouri.edu/forums-conferences/abstracts/abstract-detail.php?abstractid= | eng |
dc.subject | federalism | eng |
dc.subject | Garcia v. SAMTA (1985) | eng |
dc.subject | 10th Amendment | eng |
dc.title | An empirical analysis of the underlying premises of the [abstract] | eng |
dc.type | Presentation | eng |