[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSoltysik, Jackeng
dc.contributor.authorWebber, David J., 1951-eng
dc.contributor.corporatenameUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. Office of Undergraduate Researcheng
dc.contributor.meetingnameUndergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forum (2007 : University of Missouri--Columbia)eng
dc.date2007eng
dc.date.issued2007eng
dc.descriptionAbstract only availableeng
dc.description.abstractOver the past 30 years, there has been a debate in courts and academia over whether federalism is better protected by judicial or political safeguards. In Garcia v. SAMTA (1985), the Supreme Court ruled that it would not decide 10th Amendment cases and that the political process adequately protects state interests and federalist structure of government. I examine various versions of this thesis advanced by both judges and academics and empirically scrutinize their underlying premises.eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/1813eng
dc.languageen_USeng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. Office of Undergraduate Researcheng
dc.relation.ispartof2007 Undergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forum (MU)eng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. Office of Undergraduate Research. Undergraduate Research and Creative Achievements Forumeng
dc.source.urihttp://undergradresearch.missouri.edu/forums-conferences/abstracts/abstract-detail.php?abstractid=eng
dc.subjectfederalismeng
dc.subjectGarcia v. SAMTA (1985)eng
dc.subject10th Amendmenteng
dc.titleAn empirical analysis of the underlying premises of the [abstract]eng
dc.typePresentationeng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record