Preserving the intellectual output & resources of the University of Missouri.
Mandatory Versus Voluntary Labeling of Genetically Modified Food, Consumer Choice, and Autonomy: Reply
MOspace/Manakin Repository
Breadcrumbs Navigation
- MOspace Home
- University of Missouri-Columbia
- College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources (MU)
- Division of Applied Social Sciences (MU)
- Department of Agricultural Economics (MU)
- Economics and Management of Agrobiotechnology Center (MU)
- AgBioForum (Journal)
- AgBioForum, vol. 06, no. 3 (2003)
- View Item
Mandatory Versus Voluntary Labeling of Genetically Modified Food, Consumer Choice, and Autonomy: Reply
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/222
| Title: | Mandatory Versus Voluntary Labeling of Genetically Modified Food, Consumer Choice, and Autonomy: Reply |
| Author: | Carter, Colin Andre; Gruère, Guillaume P. |
| Keywords: |
consumer choice
autonomy labeling |
| Date: | 2003 |
| Publisher: | AgBioForum |
| Citation: | AgBioForum, 6(3) 2003: 143-144. |
| Abstract: | A rebuttal of and response to the commentary "Choice Versus Autonomy in the GM Food Labeling Debate" by philosophers Robert Streiffer and Alan Rubel who had argued that the authors' previous article on genetically modified food labeling uses improper terminology. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10355/222 |
| ISSN: | 1522-936X |
Items in MOspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
AgBioForum, vol. 06, no. 3 (2003) [10]
Contents of volume 6, number 3.