Shared more. Cited more. Safe forever.
    • advanced search
    • submit works
    • about
    • help
    • contact us
    • login
    View Item 
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • School of Medicine (MU)
    • Department of Family and Community Medicine (MU)
    • Family Physicians Inquiries Network (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries, 2003
    • View Item
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • School of Medicine (MU)
    • Department of Family and Community Medicine (MU)
    • Family Physicians Inquiries Network (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries, 2003
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    advanced searchsubmit worksabouthelpcontact us

    Browse

    All of MOspaceCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis SemesterThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis Semester

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular AuthorsStatistics by Referrer

    What is the best treatment for plantar fasciitis?

    Stadler, Teresa S.
    Johnson, E. Diane
    View/Open
    [PDF] WhatBestTreatmentPlantarFasciitis.pdf (94.71Kb)
    Date
    2003
    Format
    Article
    Metadata
    [+] Show full item record
    Abstract
    Mechanical therapies -- such as taping, tension night splinting, and rigid arch support -- are the most effective treatment for plantar fasciitis (strength of recommendation: A, based on randomized controlled trials). If limited or no improvement is observed after 6 months of mechanical therapy, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (Orthotripsy) is the next treatment of choice (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, based on meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials). When mechanical therapies and extracorporeal shock wave therapy have failed for more than 1 year, surgical treatment may be considered (SOR: C, based on a case-series study).
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10355/2971
    Part of
    Journal of family practice, 52, no. 09 (September 2003): 714-717.
    Rights
    OpenAccess.
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
    Collections
    • Clinical Inquiries, 2003

    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems
     

     


    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems