[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAdams, Gary Mitchell, 1965-eng
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, James W.eng
dc.coverage.spatialUnited Stateseng
dc.date.issued2001-01eng
dc.descriptionnvited Paper for the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Ft. Worth, TX.eng
dc.description.abstractBefore Congress debates another assistance package or the next farm bill, we should be evaluating alternative policy options. During the past year, FAPRI and AFPC were asked by Representative Charles Stenholm, ranking minority member of the House Agriculture Committee, to analyze the merits of alternative farm programs that would transfer $1, $2, or $3 billion per year (over and above the 1996 farm bill) to program crop producers (FAPRI-UMC Report 07-00). The farm program tools of interest were: a supplemental income protection program, higher marketing loan rates, and additional AMTA payments. The analysis of these options showed that even with $3 billion per year of payments it would not be sufficient to reduce the cash flow problem facing farmers (Smith and Richardson).eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/3174eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherFood and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) at the University of Missouri-Columbiaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcollectionFood and Agricultural Policy Research Institute publications (MU)eng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources. Food and Agricultural Policy Research Instituteeng
dc.subjectFood and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI)eng
dc.subject.disciplineFood and agricultural policyeng
dc.subject.lcshAgriculture and state -- United Stateseng
dc.subject.lcshFarm law -- United Stateseng
dc.subject.lcshAgriculture and state -- Evaluationeng
dc.titleExploring Options for a New Farm Billeng
dc.typeTechnical Reporteng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record