[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKryszczuk, Katherineeng
dc.contributor.authorKelsberg, Garyeng
dc.contributor.authorRich, Joanneeng
dc.date.issued2004eng
dc.description.abstractScreening patients for asymptomatic microhematuria does not appear to improve outcomes, since screening does not identify a population with increased prevalence of urologic malignancy (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, based on prospective cohort studies) or the presence of urologic disease of any type (SOR: B, based on 1 cohort study). Asymptomatic microhematuria is sometimes associated with urologic disease that requires intervention to prevent death or disability (SOR: B, based on cohort studies). However, no studies demonstrate improved outcomes from screening for asymptomatic microhematuria.eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/3198eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherFamily Physicians Inquiries Networkeng
dc.relation.ispartofcollectionClinical Inquiries, 2004 (MU)eng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. School of Medicine. Department of Family and Community Medicine. Family Physicians Inquiries Networkeng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of family practice, 53, no. 02 (February 2004)eng
dc.rightsOpenAccess.eng
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.eng
dc.subjecturologic diseaseeng
dc.subjectanatomic abnormalitieseng
dc.subjectpatient outcomeeng
dc.subject.lcshGenitourinary organs -- Diseaseseng
dc.subject.lcshUrologyeng
dc.subject.meshUrogenital Abnormalitieseng
dc.titleShould we screen adults for asymptomatic microhematuria?eng
dc.typeArticleeng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record