Should we screen for bacterial vaginosis in those at risk for preterm labor?

MOspace/Manakin Repository

Breadcrumbs Navigation

Should we screen for bacterial vaginosis in those at risk for preterm labor?

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/3199

[+] show full item record


Title: Should we screen for bacterial vaginosis in those at risk for preterm labor?
Author: Potter, Beth; Jhorden, Laura; Porter, Marlene
Keywords: neonatal infections
Nugent's criteria
Gram stain
Date: 2004-10
Publisher: Family Physicians Inquiries Network
Citation: Journal of Family Practice, 53(10) 2004: 827+.
Abstract: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is associated with preterm delivery (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, meta-analysis). However, treating asymptomatic, low-risk women with BV does not always prevent preterm delivery (SOR: A, randomized controlled trials [RCTs]). There is some benefit to early screening by Gram stain using Nugent's criteria1 (Table ) and treating BV-positive women with a history of preterm delivery, premature rupture of membranes, low birth weight infants, or spontaneous abortion. In this group, treatment has been associated with decreased rates of preterm labor, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, and low birth weight infants (SOR: B, conflicting RCTs). Empirically treating high-risk women without documented infection has been associated with an increase in preterm deliveries and neonatal infections (SOR: B, single RCT).
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/3199

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[+] show full item record