[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHines, Pamela J.eng
dc.date.issued2001eng
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.eng
dc.description.abstractScience controversies can be distinguished from one another on whether the issue of controversy is a matter of ethics, a matter needing further scientific research, or a need to make public policy decisions on the basis of incomplete information. Effective communication about the relevant issues underlying any science controversy can be improved with education about both the facts and the process of empirical science. Improved communication strategies may support the public interest in science, more effectively incorporate the public voice into policy outcomes, and improve the level of trust between the public and the research scientists.eng
dc.identifier.citationAgBioForum, 4(3&4) 2001: 186-193.eng
dc.identifier.issn1522-936Xeng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/327eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherAgBioForumeng
dc.relation.ispartofcollectionAgBioForum, vol. 4, no. 3 & 4 (2001)eng
dc.source.urihttp://www.agbioforum.missouri.edu/v4n34/v4n34a06-hines.htmeng
dc.subjecteducation ; science communicationseng
dc.subject.lcshMass media and technologyeng
dc.subject.lcshScience in mass mediaeng
dc.subject.lcshJournalism, Scientificeng
dc.titleThe Dynamics of Scientific Controversieseng
dc.typeArticleeng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record