[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDrury, A. Cooper, 1967-eng
dc.contributor.authorRudy, Michael Alaneng
dc.date.issued2012eng
dc.date.submitted2012 Falleng
dc.descriptionTitle from PDF of title page (University of Missouri--Columbia, viewed on March 11, 2013).eng
dc.descriptionThe entire thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file; a non-technical public abstract appears in the public.pdf file.eng
dc.descriptionDissertation advisor: Dr. A. Cooper Druryeng
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.eng
dc.descriptionVita.eng
dc.descriptionPh. D. University of Missouri--Columbia 2012.eng
dc.description"December 2012"eng
dc.description.abstract[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] This paper examines the process of goal achievement in conflict. Previous research on violent conflict focuses on winning and losing but fails to examine conflict from a goal achievement perspective. By creating a new variable, conflict efficacy, this dissertation fills the gap. Four major independent variables are examined in this paper. These four variables, power, alliances, regime type, and initiation are examined using multiple indicators and coding procedures to insure that the findings are robust. Power and alliance contributions have a positive effect on goal achievement as does being democratic. However, counter intuitively and against much of the previous literature, initiation has a strong negative relationship with goal achievement. This finding is investigated further and several potential reasons for this finding are explored and tested. Ultimately, this dissertation offers a new approach to the conflict outcome research agenda by focusing not on the conflict outcomes but on what each state receives from the use of force.eng
dc.description.bibrefIncludes bibliographical references.eng
dc.format.extentxii, 191 pageseng
dc.identifier.oclc872569522eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32469/10355/33187eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/33187
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertationseng
dc.rightsAccess is limited to the campuses of the University of Missouri.eng
dc.subjectgoal achievementeng
dc.subjectconflict efficacyeng
dc.subjectconflict initiationeng
dc.titleWar, what is it good for? Absolutely something : a large N study of conflict efficacyeng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplinePolitical science (MU)eng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
thesis.degree.levelDoctoraleng
thesis.degree.namePh. D.eng


Files in this item

[PDF]
[PDF]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record