Shared more. Cited more. Safe forever.
    • advanced search
    • submit works
    • about
    • help
    • contact us
    • login
    View Item 
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • School of Medicine (MU)
    • Department of Family and Community Medicine (MU)
    • Family Physicians Inquiries Network (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries, 2005
    • View Item
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • School of Medicine (MU)
    • Department of Family and Community Medicine (MU)
    • Family Physicians Inquiries Network (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries, 2005
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    advanced searchsubmit worksabouthelpcontact us

    Browse

    All of MOspaceCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis SemesterThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis Semester

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular AuthorsStatistics by Referrer

    What is the appropriate diagnostic evaluation of fibroids?

    Griffin, Kyle W.
    Ellis, Mark R.
    Wilder, Laura
    View/Open
    [PDF] WhatAppropriateDiagnosticFibroids.pdf (56.42Kb)
    Date
    2005
    Format
    Article
    Metadata
    [+] Show full item record
    Abstract
    Although transvaginal sonography (TVS) has inconsistent sensitivity (0.21-1.00) and specificity (0.53-1.00), its cost-efficiency and noninvasiveness make it the best initial test for ruling in fibroid disease (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, based on expert opinion, a systematic review, and prospective studies). Sonohysterography (SHG) and hysteroscopy have superior sensitivity, specificity, and more discriminating positive and negative likelihood ratios for diagnosing fibroids than does TVS (SOR: B, systematic review). SHG is less painful, less invasive, and more cost-effective than hysteroscopy (SOR: B; single, prospective comparative study and cost comparison). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had comparable precision to TVS in a single study, but it is too expensive to be a good initial test for fibroids (SOR: C, expert opinion and an uncontrolled prospective study). One study reported a strong correlation between ultrasound and bimanual examination (SOR: C, retrospective case review).
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10355/3328
    Part of
    Journal of family practice, 54, no. 05 (May 2005): 458+
    Rights
    OpenAccess.
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
    Collections
    • Clinical Inquiries, 2005

    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems
     

     


    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems