[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreer, Steveneng
dc.contributor.authorChambliss, M. Leeeng
dc.contributor.authorMackler, Leslieeng
dc.date.issued2005eng
dc.description.abstractNo examination technique objectively proves malingering (strength of recommendation [SOR]: C, expert opinion). Waddell's signs are associated with poor treatment outcomes but cannot discriminate organic from nonorganic causes (SOR: B, systematic review of low-quality studies). Hoover's and the Abductor sign indicate nonorganic paralysis (SOR: C, small, lower-quality case-control studies).eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/3378eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherFamily Physicians Inquiries Networkeng
dc.relation.ispartofcollectionClinical Inquiries, 2005 (MU)eng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. School of Medicine. Department of Family and Community Medicine. Family Physicians Inquiries Networkeng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of family practice, 54, no. 08 (August 2005)eng
dc.rightsOpenAccess.eng
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.eng
dc.subjectHoover's signeng
dc.subjectAbductor signeng
dc.subjectWaddell's signseng
dc.subjectparalysiseng
dc.subject.lcshMalingering -- diagnosiseng
dc.subject.lcshNeuropsychological testseng
dc.titleWhat physical exam techniques are useful to detect malingering?eng
dc.typeArticleeng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record