[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSontheimer, Danieleng
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Marcy L.eng
dc.date.issued2006-04eng
dc.description.abstractOf the available oral therapies for common warts, none has sufficient evidence to recommend it as an effective therapy (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B). To date, no oral agent has been shown to be effective in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial. Very limited evidence is emerging that zinc may be effective (SOR: C).eng
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Family Practice, 55(4) 2006: 353-354.eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/3420eng
dc.publisherFamily Physicians Inquiries Networkeng
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Inquiries, 2006 (MU)eng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. School of Medicine. Department of Family and Community Medicine. Family Physicians Inquiries Networkeng
dc.subjectcommon wartseng
dc.subjectside effectseng
dc.subjectzinceng
dc.subject.lcshWartseng
dc.subject.lcshZinc -- Therapeutic Useeng
dc.titleAre oral agents effective for the treatment of verruca vulgaris?eng
dc.typeArticleeng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record