[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSontheimer, Danieleng
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Marcy L.eng
dc.date.issued2006eng
dc.description.abstractOf the available oral therapies for common warts, none has sufficient evidence to recommend it as an effective therapy (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B). To date, no oral agent has been shown to be effective in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial. Very limited evidence is emerging that zinc may be effective (SOR: C).eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/3420eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherFamily Physicians Inquiries Networkeng
dc.relation.ispartofcollectionClinical Inquiries, 2006 (MU)eng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. School of Medicine. Department of Family and Community Medicine. Family Physicians Inquiries Networkeng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of family practice, 55, no. 04 (April 2006)eng
dc.rightsOpenAccess.eng
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.eng
dc.subjectcommon wartseng
dc.subjectside effectseng
dc.subjectzinceng
dc.subject.lcshWartseng
dc.subject.lcshZinc -- Therapeutic Useeng
dc.titleAre oral agents effective for the treatment of verruca vulgaris?eng
dc.typeArticleeng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record