Shared more. Cited more. Safe forever.
    • advanced search
    • submit works
    • about
    • help
    • contact us
    • login
    View Item 
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • School of Medicine (MU)
    • Department of Family and Community Medicine (MU)
    • Family Physicians Inquiries Network (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries, 2013
    • View Item
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • School of Medicine (MU)
    • Department of Family and Community Medicine (MU)
    • Family Physicians Inquiries Network (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries, 2013
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    advanced searchsubmit worksabouthelpcontact us

    Browse

    All of MOspaceCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis SemesterThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis Semester

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular AuthorsStatistics by Referrer

    What is the best treatment for plant-induced contact dermatitis?

    Eaton, Joshua
    Crawford, Paul
    Smith, Rita
    View/Open
    [PDF] WhatTreatmentPlantDermatitis.pdf (336.8Kb)
    Date
    2013
    Format
    Article
    Metadata
    [+] Show full item record
    Abstract
    It's unclear which treatment is best, because there have been no head-to-head comparisons of treatments for Rhus (plant-induced) contact dermatitis. That said, topical high-potency steroids slightly improve pruritus and the appearance of the rash (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, small cohort studies). Neither topical pimecrolimus (an immunomodulatory drug) nor jewelweed extract are helpful (SOR: B, 1 small randomized controlled trial [RCT]). Oral steroids improve symptoms in severe cases (SOR: C, expert opinion).
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10355/35656
    Part of
    Journal of family practice, 62, no. 06 (June 2013): 309+.
    Rights
    OpenAccess.
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
    Collections
    • Clinical Inquiries, 2013

    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems
     

     


    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems