Shared more. Cited more. Safe forever.
    • advanced search
    • submit works
    • about
    • help
    • contact us
    • login
    View Item 
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • School of Medicine (MU)
    • Department of Family and Community Medicine (MU)
    • Family Physicians Inquiries Network (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries, 2008
    • View Item
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • School of Medicine (MU)
    • Department of Family and Community Medicine (MU)
    • Family Physicians Inquiries Network (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries (MU)
    • Clinical Inquiries, 2008
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    advanced searchsubmit worksabouthelpcontact us

    Browse

    All of MOspaceCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleSubjectIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis SemesterThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleSubjectIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis Semester

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular AuthorsStatistics by Referrer

    What is the best treatment for oral thrush in healthy infants?

    Su, Cindy W.
    Gaskie, Sean
    Jamieson, Barbara
    View/Open
    [PDF] WhatTreatmentOralThrushInfant.pdf (110.0Kb)
    Date
    2008
    Format
    Article
    Metadata
    [+] Show full item record
    Abstract
    Nystatin oral suspension is a safe first-line therapy; fluconazole is more effective (strength of recommendation [SOR ]: B, 1 small randomized controlled trial [RCT]) but has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in immunocompetent infants. Miconazole oral gel is also more effective than nystatin suspension, but is not commercially available in the United States (SOR : B, one small RCT). Gentian violet may be effective, but it stains skin and clothes and is associated with mucosal ulceration (SOR : B, 1 small retrospective cohort study).
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10355/3831
    Part of
    Journal of family practice, 57, no. 07 (July 2008): 484-485.
    Rights
    OpenAccess.
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
    Collections
    • Clinical Inquiries, 2008

    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems
     

     


    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems