[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSearson, Staceyeng
dc.contributor.authorBlackwell, Jeaneng
dc.date.issued2009eng
dc.description.abstractRoutine amniotomy doesn't significantly reduce the duration of first-stage labor in either primiparous or multiparous women (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, systematic review of several randomized, controlled trials [RCTs]); it slightly shortens second-stage labor in primiparous women only (SOR: A, systematic review of several RCTs). A trend toward increased rates of cesarean section has been noted in low-risk women who undergo routine amniotomy (SOR: A, systematic review of several RCTs). The procedure doesn't appear to affect neonatal outcomes (SOR: B, uncommon endpoint in several large RCTs).eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/3868eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherFamily Physicians Inquiries Networkeng
dc.relation.ispartofcollectionClinical Inquiries, 2009 (MU)eng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. School of Medicine. Department of Family and Community Medicine. Family Physicians Inquiries Networkeng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of family practice, 58, no. 03 (March 2009): 161a-161b.eng
dc.rightsOpenAccess.eng
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.eng
dc.subjectlabor accelerationeng
dc.subjectcesarean section rateseng
dc.subjectfirst-stage laboreng
dc.subjectneonatal outcomeeng
dc.subject.lcshLabor, Induced (Obstetrics)eng
dc.subject.lcshCesarean section -- Preventioneng
dc.subject.lcshAmniotic liquid -- Examinationeng
dc.titleDoes routine amniotomy have a role in normal labor?eng
dc.typeArticleeng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record