[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMull, Courtneyeng
dc.contributor.authorMcPherson, Vanessaeng
dc.contributor.authorZolotor, Adam J.eng
dc.contributor.authorKaufmann, Leonoraeng
dc.date.issued2009-12eng
dc.description.abstractA reduction in the intercontraction interval is associated with active labor (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, cohort study). Most primigravidas who have had regular contractions for 2 hours and multigravidas who have had regular contractions for 1 hour haven't transitioned into the active phase of labor (SOR: B, cohort study).eng
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Family Practice, 58(12) 2009: 676a-676c.eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/4006eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherFamily Physicians Inquiries Networkeng
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Inquiries, 2009 (MU)eng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. School of Medicine. Department of Family and Community Medicine. Family Physicians Inquiries Networkeng
dc.rightsOpenAccess.eng
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.eng
dc.subjectlatent phaseeng
dc.subjectcervical dilatationeng
dc.subjectcesarean sectioneng
dc.subjectlabor assessment programeng
dc.subject.lcshUterus -- Contractioneng
dc.subject.lcshLabor (Obstetrics)eng
dc.subject.lcshLabor (Obstetrics) -- Complications -- Preventioneng
dc.titleDo intercontraction intervals predict when a woman at term should seek evaluation of labor?eng
dc.typeArticleeng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record