[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHudson, Berkleyeng
dc.contributor.authorRothstein, Reneeeng
dc.date.issued2013eng
dc.date.submitted2013 Falleng
dc.description"December 2013."eng
dc.description"A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri--Columbia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts."eng
dc.descriptionThesis adviser: Dr. Berkley Hudson.eng
dc.description.abstract[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] Today, all communications products are multimodal, employing a variety of communications techniques, from writing to graphics (and more), in one product. Modes of communications must be synthesized to convey a message. The foundation of any communications artifact is the relationship between the words contained in it and its visual structure. Some forward-looking thinkers suggest that the division of labor between the narrative and visual components of materials has become increasingly blurry. As a consequence, they suggest, students must be trained to be visually and verbally "ambidextrous." This research examined college mass communications curricula to assess the extent to which programs of study nurture "visual-verbal ambidexterity" in students. Public relations, advertising and strategic communications programs at five schools of mass communications were examined. In-depth interviews with a select group of professors and textual analysis of course materials was undertaken to evaluate the programs. The study revealed a mixed picture. In many programs, students have substantial opportunities to practice visual-verbal integration in courses spanning writing, creative thinking and design. Yet at others it is still possible to graduate without taking a class in graphic design. Silos between schools of mass communications and art departments limit opportunities for true situated practice. Finally, accreditation standards constrain faculty in shaping curricula that exposes students to visual-verbal hybrid coursework. In sum, progress is being made, but there is more to be done. This inquiry scans the landscape, and offers suggestions for future study and possible solutions to the challenge.eng
dc.description.bibrefIncludes bibliographical references (pages 55-64).eng
dc.format.extent1 online resource (vii, 64 pages)eng
dc.identifier.oclc898340942eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/43158
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32469/10355/43158eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri--Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertationseng
dc.rightsAccess is limited to the University of Missouri - Columbia.eng
dc.sourceSubmitted by the University of Missouri--Columbia Graduate Schooleng
dc.subject.lcshMass media -- Study and teachingeng
dc.subject.lcshEducation, Higher -- Curriculaeng
dc.subject.lcshVisual learningeng
dc.subject.lcshVerbal learningeng
dc.titleBridging the visual-verbal divide in college mass communications programseng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplineJournalism (MU)eng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
thesis.degree.levelMasterseng
thesis.degree.nameM.A.eng


Files in this item

[PDF]
[PDF]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record