[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMatisziw, Timothy C. (Timothy Clark)eng
dc.contributor.authorWesley, Aaron Mattheweng
dc.coverage.spatialMissouri -- Saint Louiseng
dc.date.issued2014eng
dc.date.submitted2014 Summereng
dc.description"May 2014."eng
dc.descriptionThesis supervisor: Dr. Timothy Matisziw.eng
dc.description.abstractAlthough geographic studies of disaster vulnerability and resilience have been central to the formulation of federal emergency management policy, recent community resilience research has diverged significantly from the core foci of the discipline: the importance of place, of scale, and the complexity of human-environment interactions. Three disconcerting trends in the literature can be observed. First, there has been a heavy reliance on the tools of linear systems science to characterize and measure the human dimensions of resilience - dimensions which are increasingly examined in terms of their nonlinearity, dynamism and complexity in other scientific disciplines. Second, most of the variables typically used as proxies for community resilience are not actually indicative of community-scale processes, but rather describe individual-scale behavioral and household-scale socioeconomic characteristics. Third, the current practice of aggregating resilience indicators to large, heterogeneous geographic areas in order to communicate community-level resilience can actually mask and mischaracterize the local, place-specific variability of those indicators. This thesis presents a rethinking of geography's conceptual model of population disaster resilience and the methods used to measure it at the community level. Drawing on diverse theoretical linkages on the subject from across the social and natural sciences, and on the current perspectives and information requirements of local emergency managers, a more holistic and meaningful approach to measuring community resilience is proposed. Specifically, in recognition of a need to integrate both expert and lay local perspectives into resilience calculations, a system for assimilating such qualitative data into quantitative analysis is adapted from complexity theory. Also, in acknowledgement of the multiple levels at which resilience-building processes may operate in human systems, and the unique ways disaster resilience can manifest in different places, a new framework for baleng
dc.description.bibrefIncludes bibliographical references (pages 158-173).eng
dc.format.extent1 online resource (xii, 173 pages) : illustrations (some color), color mapseng
dc.identifier.merlinb107159247eng
dc.identifier.oclc903221204eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/44344
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.32469/10355/44344eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertations. These. 2014 Theses. 2014 Freely available theseseng
dc.subjectAuthor supplied: disaster resilience, knowledge-based measurement, spatial modeling, complexity science, hazard vulnerabilityeng
dc.subject.lcshEmergency managementeng
dc.subject.lcshExpert systems (Computer science)eng
dc.subject.lcshResilience (Personality trait)eng
dc.titleMeasuring community resilience to disastereng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplineGeography (MU)eng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaeng
thesis.degree.levelMasterseng
thesis.degree.nameM.A.eng


Files in this item

[PDF]
[PDF]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record