[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGeisbrecht, Erika R.eng
dc.contributor.authorBiersmith, Bridget H.eng
dc.date.issued2015-05-19eng
dc.date.submitted2014 Falleng
dc.descriptionTitle from PDF of title page, viewed on May 29, 2015eng
dc.descriptionDissertation advisor: Erika R. Geisbrechteng
dc.descriptionVitaeng
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographic references (pages 77-82)eng
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D.)--School of Biological Sciences. University of Missouri--Kansas City, 2014eng
dc.description.abstractThe evolutionarily conserved Dock proteins function as unconventional guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs). Upon binding to ELMO (Engulfment and cell motility) proteins, Dock-ELMO complexes activate the Rho family of small GTPases to mediate a diverse array of biological processes, including cell motility, apoptotic cell clearance, and axon guidance. Overlapping expression patterns and functional redundancy among the eleven vertebrate Dock family members, which are subdivided into four families (Dock-A, B, C, and D), complicate genetic analysis. Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent genetic model organism to understand Dock protein function as its genome encodes one ortholog per subfamily: Myoblast city (Mbc; Dock- A) and Sponge (Spg; Dock-B). The target GTPase of the Dock-A subfamily is Rac, which modulates actin dynamics. However, the in vivo GTPase downstream of the Dock- B subfamily remains unclear. Herein we show that the roles of Spg and Mbc are not redundant in the Drosophila somatic muscle, central nervous system (CNS), or the dorsal vessel (dv). Moreover, we confirm the in vivo role of Mbc upstream of Rac and provide evidence that Spg functions in concert with Rap1 to regulate aspects of adhesion. Together these data show that Mbc and Spg can have differential downstream GTPase targets. Our findings predict that the ability to regulate downstream GTPases is dependent on cellular context and allows for the fine-tuning of actin cytoskeletal or cell adhesion events in biological processes that undergo cell morphogenesis.eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsIntroduction -- The dock protein sponge binds elmo and functions in drosophila embryonic development -- Differential roles of the unconventional dock family members myoblast city and sponge in drosophila development -- Material and methods -- Discussioneng
dc.format.extentix, 93 pageseng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/45540eng
dc.subject.lcshProteinseng
dc.subject.lcshDrosophila -- Developmenteng
dc.subject.otherDissertation -- University of Missouri--Kansas City -- Biologyeng
dc.titleDetermining the differential roles of the dock family of GEFs in drosophila developmenteng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplineCell Biology and Biophysics (UMKC)eng
thesis.degree.disciplineMolecular Biology and Biochemistry (UMKC)eng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Kansas Cityeng
thesis.degree.levelDoctoraleng
thesis.degree.namePh.D.eng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record