[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMillspaugh, Joshua J.en
dc.contributor.advisorThompson, Frank R. (Frank Richard)en
dc.contributor.authorRittenhouse, Chadwick D.en_US
dc.date.issued2008eng
dc.date.submitted2008 Springen
dc.descriptionThe entire dissertation/thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file (which also appears in the research.pdf); a non-technical general description, or public abstract, appears in the public.pdf file.en_US
dc.descriptionTitle from title screen of research.pdf file (viewed on June 15, 2009)en_US
dc.descriptionVita.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.) University of Missouri-Columbia 2008.en_US
dc.descriptionDissertations, Academic -- University of Missouri--Columbia -- Fisheries and wildlife.en_US
dc.description.abstractA common goal in land-management planning is to describe the relationship between management actions, vegetation and wildlife habitat conditions for large landscapes. Achieving this goal can be challenging because ecological processes of disturbance (natural and anthropogenic) and succession affect vegetation composition and structure, which subsequently affects current and future habitat conditions for wildlife. Further, habitat suitability is often used as a surrogate for demographic response by wildlife to vegetation change yet this assumed relationship is rarely evaluated. I developed habitat suitability models for 10 wildlife species and validated two of those models as predictors of demographic responses (e.g., territory density and nest success). I then simulated future forest conditions and evaluated habitat suitability 10, 50, and 150 years from present as part of the Hoosier National Forest (HNF) plan revision. No single management alternative was best for all wildlife species. Without harvest or prescribed fire, early successional wildlife species will be extirpated from the HNF within 50 years. Harvest benefited early successional species without greatly affecting habitat suitability for late successional species. By incorporating ecological processes of disturbance and succession while retaining the resolution necessary for evaluating wildlife habitat suitability, this modeling approach contributed knowledge to the planning process and was a valuable tool for communicating differences among alternatives to stakeholders.en_US
dc.identifier.merlin.b68967640en_US
dc.identifier.oclc400004797en_US
dc.identifier.otherRittenhouseC-033109-D9473en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/5537
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofcollection2008 Freely available dissertations (MU)
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertations. Dissertations. 2008 Dissertations
dc.subject.lcshForest managementen_US
dc.subject.lcshHabitat (Ecology)en_US
dc.subject.lcshPrescribed burningen_US
dc.titleWildlife response to spatial and temporal changes in forest habitaten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineFisheries and wildlife sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineFisheries and wildlife scienceseng
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Columbiaen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.namePh. D.en_US


Files in this item

[PDF]
[PDF]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record