Patterns of Political Support and Pathways to Final Impact

MOspace/Manakin Repository

Breadcrumbs Navigation

Patterns of Political Support and Pathways to Final Impact

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

[-] show simple item record Pray, Carl Unnevehr, Laurian Juma, Calestous Paarlberg, Robert L. 2008-10-09T14:40:48Z 2008-10-09T14:40:48Z 2007
dc.identifier.citation AgBioForum, 10(3) 2007: 201-207. en
dc.identifier.issn 1522-936X
dc.description.abstract A hypothetical scheme is offered for predicting which biofortified food technologies will enjoy greatest political support or opposition and from which actors on the political landscape. Beyond political support, benefits to nutrition from biofortified crops will also require acceptance by both farmers and consumers, as well as adequate nutrient uptake. Keys are reviewed to strengthening these three non-political links in the chain of final success. A four-pronged strategy for moving forward is then offered. en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher AgBioForum en
dc.subject producer acceptance en
dc.subject biofortification en
dc.subject GMO en
dc.subject nutrient traits en
dc.subject agronomic traits en
dc.subject consumer acceptance en
dc.subject abiotic stress en
dc.subject.lcsh Genetically modified foods -- Public opinion en
dc.subject.lcsh Farmers -- Attitudes en
dc.subject.lcsh Consumers' preferences en
dc.subject.lcsh Enriched foods -- Public opinion en
dc.title Patterns of Political Support and Pathways to Final Impact en
dc.type Article en
dc.relation.ispartofcommunity University of Missouri-Columbia. College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources. Division of Applied Social Sciences. Department of Agricultural Economics. Economics and Management of Agrobiotechnology Center. AgBioForum (Journal)
dc.relation.ispartofcollection AgBioForum, vol. 10, no. 3 (2007)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] show simple item record