[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPray, Carl E. (Carl Esek)eng
dc.contributor.authorUnnevehr, Laurianeng
dc.contributor.authorJuma, Calestouseng
dc.contributor.authorPaarlberg, Robert L.eng
dc.date.issued2007eng
dc.description.abstractA hypothetical scheme is offered for predicting which biofortified food technologies will enjoy greatest political support or opposition and from which actors on the political landscape. Beyond political support, benefits to nutrition from biofortified crops will also require acceptance by both farmers and consumers, as well as adequate nutrient uptake. Keys are reviewed to strengthening these three non-political links in the chain of final success. A four-pronged strategy for moving forward is then offered.eng
dc.identifier.citationAgBioForum, 10(3) 2007: 201-207.eng
dc.identifier.issn1522-936Xeng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/59eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherAgBioForumeng
dc.relation.ispartofcollectionAgBioForum, vol. 10, no. 3 (2007)eng
dc.subjectproducer acceptanceeng
dc.subjectbiofortificationeng
dc.subjectGMOeng
dc.subjectnutrient traitseng
dc.subjectagronomic traitseng
dc.subjectconsumer acceptanceeng
dc.subjectabiotic stresseng
dc.subject.lcshGenetically modified foods -- Public opinioneng
dc.subject.lcshFarmers -- Attitudeseng
dc.subject.lcshConsumers' preferenceseng
dc.subject.lcshEnriched foods -- Public opinioneng
dc.titlePatterns of Political Support and Pathways to Final Impacteng
dc.typeArticleeng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record