[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPray, Carl
dc.contributor.authorUnnevehr, Laurian
dc.contributor.authorJuma, Calestous
dc.contributor.authorPaarlberg, Robert L.
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractA hypothetical scheme is offered for predicting which biofortified food technologies will enjoy greatest political support or opposition and from which actors on the political landscape. Beyond political support, benefits to nutrition from biofortified crops will also require acceptance by both farmers and consumers, as well as adequate nutrient uptake. Keys are reviewed to strengthening these three non-political links in the chain of final success. A four-pronged strategy for moving forward is then offered.en
dc.identifier.citationAgBioForum, 10(3) 2007: 201-207.en
dc.identifier.issn1522-936X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/59
dc.publisherAgBioForumen
dc.relation.ispartofcollectionAgBioForum, vol. 10, no. 3 (2007)
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources. Division of Applied Social Sciences. Department of Agricultural Economics. Economics and Management of Agrobiotechnology Center. AgBioForum (Journal)
dc.subjectproducer acceptanceen
dc.subjectbiofortificationen
dc.subjectGMOen
dc.subjectnutrient traitsen
dc.subjectagronomic traitsen
dc.subjectconsumer acceptanceen
dc.subjectabiotic stressen
dc.subject.lcshGenetically modified foods -- Public opinionen
dc.subject.lcshFarmers -- Attitudesen
dc.subject.lcshConsumers' preferencesen
dc.subject.lcshEnriched foods -- Public opinionen
dc.titlePatterns of Political Support and Pathways to Final Impacten
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record