dc.contributor.advisor | Stallmann, Judith I. | eng |
dc.contributor.author | Kong, Jing, 1982- | eng |
dc.coverage.spatial | China | eng |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | eng |
dc.date.submitted | 2007 Fall | eng |
dc.description | The entire dissertation/thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file (which also appears in the research.pdf); a non-technical general description, or public abstract, appears in the public.pdf file. | eng |
dc.description | Title from title screen of research.pdf file (viewed on April 15, 2008) | eng |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references. | eng |
dc.description | Thesis (M.S.) University of Missouri-Columbia 2007. | eng |
dc.description | Dissertations, Academic -- University of Missouri--Columbia -- Agricultural economics. | eng |
dc.description.abstract | [ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] The economic reforms during the past eighteen years in China have increased income inequality. This study investigates the impact of policy changes on income inequality both within and between rural villages in Zhejiang province in China. Income inequality was measured using the Gini coefficient. The Gini coefficient was decomposed into income factors: labor, entrepreneurship, capital, transfer and other income. The decomposition includes the proportion of income from each factor and its distribution, known as the concentration rate, both of which affect income distribution. The major cause of income inequality within villages is the differences in factor endowments of each family, which families change in response to policy. Entrepreneurship and capital income have the highest concentration rates, which contribute to increasing inequality within villages. Labor income is distributed similar to overall income, and its proportion decreased, which means that labor income became more equally distributed within villages.The major cause of income inequality among villages is the differences of endowments and market access. The proportion of entrepreneurship and capital income increased, and these two income factors have the highest concentration rates, contributing to an increase in inequality between villages. Labor income became more equality distributed among villages through time. Patterns of and causes of income inequality varied among the villages, suggesting that policy needs to be flexible to address income inequality. | eng |
dc.identifier.merlin | b63066415 | eng |
dc.identifier.oclc | 224043759 | eng |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10355/6029 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/6029 | eng |
dc.language | English | eng |
dc.publisher | University of Missouri--Columbia | eng |
dc.relation.ispartofcommunity | University of Missouri--Columbia. Graduate School. Theses and Dissertations | eng |
dc.rights | Access is limited to the campuses of the University of Missouri. | eng |
dc.subject.lcsh | Agriculture and state | eng |
dc.subject.lcsh | Produce trade -- Government policy | eng |
dc.subject.lcsh | Income distribution | eng |
dc.title | Income inequality within and between villages in a rural region of China | eng |
dc.type | Thesis | eng |
thesis.degree.discipline | Agricultural economics (MU) | eng |
thesis.degree.grantor | University of Missouri--Columbia | eng |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | eng |
thesis.degree.name | M.S. | eng |