[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMcDowd, Joan M.
dc.contributor.authorPoirier, Mark W.
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017 Summer
dc.descriptionTitle from PDF of title page, viewed October 30, 2017
dc.descriptionThesis advisor: Joan M. McDowd
dc.descriptionVita
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 94-102)
dc.descriptionThesis (M.A.)--Department of Psychology. University of Missouri--Kansas City, 2017
dc.description.abstractDecision support tools that incorporate predictive risk estimates can be used to assist patients and their families in making better-informed choices about treatment options. The format utilized to present predictive risk estimates can influence risk perception and treatment decisions. The study reported here investigated the influence of graph format on information processing and decision-making in relation to rt-PA therapy for stroke. Forty-five older adults were asked to make a hypothetical decision about rt-PA while viewing rt-PA risk information presented in one of three graph formats. Eye tracking, scan path, and transition analysis were used to investigate differences in information processing by graph format. Graph format did not affect whether or not study participants said yes to rt-PA treatment. There was an effect of graph format on decisional uncertainty, study time, and memory accuracy. Mean fixation densities and common transitions were significantly different by information area, graph format. and time epoch. Whether graph format alone can influence decision strategies enough to affect choice remains an open question. However, using fixation density and transition probabilities together appears to be a viable means of inferring information processing and discerning information processing differences.eng
dc.description.tableofcontentsJournal article -- Literature review -- Original proposal summary and methods -- Analyses -- Appendix A. Literature Review Figures -- Appendix B. Informed Consent -- Appendix C. Cognitive Aging Conference Poster -- Appendix D. iHIITS Demographics -- Appendix E. Working with Numbers -- Appendix F. Working with Graphs -- Appendix G. Decisional Conflict Scale -- Appendix H. Comprehension Quiz
dc.format.extentix, 103 pages
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/61856
dc.publisherUniversity of Missouri--Kansas Cityeng
dc.subject.lcshMedical care -- Decision making -- Charts, diagrams, etc.
dc.subject.otherThesis -- University of Missouri--Kansas City -- Psychology
dc.titleGraph Format Effects in Processing Health Outcome Informationeng
dc.typeThesiseng
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology (UMKC)
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Missouri--Kansas City
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameM.A.


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record