dc.contributor.advisor | Walker, Mary P. | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Venugopalan, Shankar Rengasamy | |
dc.contributor.author | Eichholz, Andrew | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017 Fall | |
dc.description | Title from PDF of title page, viewed December 13, 2017 | |
dc.description | Thesis advisors: Shankar Rengasamy Venugopalan and Mary P. Walker | |
dc.description | Vita | |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (pages 44-48) | |
dc.description | Thesis (M.S.)--School of Dentistry. University of Missouri--Kansas City, 2017 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study examined the preferences of esthetic smile characteristics between general
dentists and specialists in orthodontics, periodontics, and prosthodontics using a six item
pilot survey. Characteristics examined included gingival display, vertical relationship of
lateral incisor to central incisor and canine, mesiodistal position of the gingival height of
contour (zenith) of the maxillary lateral incisor, smile line, amount of visible buccal corridor
space, and width ratio of the maxillary anterior teeth.
A photograph showing an esthetically pleasing smile of a female was captured,
cropped and mirrored at the midline to appear bilaterally symmetrical using Adobe
Photoshop. For each characteristic, the baseline photograph was incrementally altered
digitally, then all photographs of a single characteristic were displayed on each separate page
of the survey. The survey was divided into two parts: Part I provided no prompting of the
specific characteristic being evaluated, whereas Part II was prompted. Participants were
instructed to select one photograph in each series for ‘most esthetic’ and ‘least esthetic’ in
both Parts I and II. Five participants in each of the four professional categories (n=20), all
either part- or full-time faculty at the UMKC School of Dentistry, were recruited though an
email advertisement. Those who met the inclusion criteria completed the survey in a solitary,
uninterrupted manner.
Statistical analysis of the gathered data was performed with the Fisher’s Exact test
and significance was set at p ≤ .05. In addition, an agreement test was used to compare
between each individual’s responses for Parts I and II.
Statistically significant differences between general dentists and the specialists were
found only for the width ratio of the maxillary anterior teeth, and only when not prompted:
generalists preferred a width ratio of 0.65 while specialists preferred 0.7. Preferences for all
other characteristics were similar across disciplines. When comparing survey responses with
or without prompting, generalists tended to change their selections more frequently when
provided with prompting information.
The results of this study suggest that specialists prefer wider smiles than generalists.
In addition, specialists are more readily able to identify their preferences when evaluating the
esthetic nature of smiles. | eng |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Introduction -- Materials and methods -- Results -- Discussion -- Literature cited -- Appendix A. IRB letter -- Appendix B. Authorization and release for photography -- Appendix C. Email advertisement -- Appendix D. Verbal script for survey instructions -- Appendix E. Survey, Part 1 -- Appendix F. Survey, Part 2 -- Appendix G. Participant comments | |
dc.format.extent | x, 76 pages | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10355/62214 | |
dc.publisher | University of Missouri--Kansas City | eng |
dc.subject.lcsh | Dentistry -- Aesthetic aspects | |
dc.subject.mesh | Esthetics, Dental | |
dc.subject.other | Thesis -- University of Missouri--Kansas City -- Dentistry | |
dc.title | Esthetic Smile Preferences of Dental Professionals | eng |
dc.type | Thesis | eng |
thesis.degree.discipline | Oral and Craniofacial Sciences (UMKC) | |
thesis.degree.grantor | University of Missouri--Kansas City | |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | |
thesis.degree.name | M.S. | |