Smoke in a Bottle: Adolescent Literacies and Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies in an Urban Catholic High School
Abstract
Increased standardization within adolescent literacy education leads to
dehumanization of students who become a demographic label, statistic, or problem to fix
(Blackburn, 2013; Freire, 1996; Gordon, 2009; Paris & Alim, 2017; Paris & Winn, 2013).
This is particularly true in urban contexts where cultural and linguistic diversities are
essentialized, viewed as neutral, or erased from the curriculum (Alim & Paris, 2017;
Alvermann, 2011b; Christenbury, Bomer, & Smagorinsky, 2011; Gadsden & Dixon-Roman,
2016; Gutiérrez & Penuel, 2014), responses that neglect the impact of culture on learning
(Hollins, 2015). This study uses a humanizing, critical ethnographic perspective (Paris &
Winn, 2013; Street, 1984) and participant observer methods (Spradley, 1980) to investigate
the adolescent literacy instructional practices at an urban Catholic high school. Catholic
schools have historically been sites of academic achievement for students from marginalized
groups, demonstrating opportunity and potential for highly effective adolescent literacy
practices (Gabert, 1973; Greeley, 1982; Horning, 2013). Using a critical sociocultural
theoretical orientation (Moje, Lewis, Encisco, 2007) and culturally sustaining pedagogies
(Paris, 2012; Paris & Alim 2014, 2017) as a framework, this research asked the questions:
How does the framework of culturally sustaining pedagogies inform teachers’ understandings
of effective literacy instruction in a religious high school? and What practices are highly
effective urban religious school teachers using to support adolescent students’ literacy
achievement? Findings provide localized information to support adolescent literacies
instruction and leadership at the urban Catholic school site, expand the body of literature
surrounding culturally sustaining pedagogies, and complicate understandings of highly
effective literacy instruction in an era of increasingly standardized schooling.
Table of Contents
Introduction to the study -- Review of related research -- Research methodologies -- Findings and interpretations -- Implications, recommendations and conclusion -- Appendix A. Interview protocol for administrators -- Appendix B. Resources for teaching native American literature -- Appendix C. Curriculum validation
Degree
Ph.D.