[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSattler, Thomaseng
dc.contributor.authorBorcard, Danieleng
dc.contributor.authorArlettaz, Raphaeleng
dc.contributor.authorBontadina, Fabioeng
dc.contributor.authorLegendre, P.eng
dc.contributor.authorObrist, M. K.eng
dc.contributor.authorMoretti, Marcoeng
dc.coverage.spatialSwitzerland -- Luganoeng
dc.date.issued2010eng
dc.descriptionIn our study, we used three model communities (spiders, bees, birds) to address the following questions: (1) What environmental variables measured at which spatial scale (radius) best explain community composition in urban areas? (2) How much of the variation in community composition is explained by environmental variables measured at four radii, individually, or in combinations? (3) What is the relative importance of the purely environmental (PE), the spatially structured environmental (SSE), and the purely spatial (PS) components on local community composition? With this last question, which to our knowledge has not yet been addressed for urban environments in any taxonomic group, we identify the processes (niche, neutral) that best explain the observed community compositions.eng
dc.description.abstractSpatially organized distribution patterns of species and communities are shaped by both autogenic processes (neutral mechanism theory) and exogenous processes (niche theory). In the latter, environmental variables that are themselves spatially organized induce spatial structure in the response variables. The relative importance of these processes has not yet been investigated in urban habitats. We compared the variance explained by purely spatial, spatially structured environmental, and purely environmental components for the community composition of spiders (Araneae), bees (Apidae), and birds (Aves) at 96 locations in three Swiss cities. Environmental variables (topography, climate, land cover, urban green management) were measured on four different radii around sampling points (<10 m, 50 m, 250 m, 1000 m), while Moran's eigenvector maps (MEMs) acted as spatial variables. All three taxonomic groups showed weak spatial structure. Spider communities reacted to very fine‐scaled environmental changes of lawn and meadow management and climate. Bird community composition was determined by woody plants as well as solar radiation at all radii, the scale of the influence varying among species. Bee communities were weakly explained by isolated variables only. Our results suggest that the anthropogenic structuring of urban areas has disrupted the spatial organization of environmental variables and inhibited the development of biotic spatial processes. The near absence of spatial structure may therefore be a feature typical of urban species assemblages, resulting in urban community composition mainly influenced by local environmental variables. Urban environments represent a close-knit mosaic of habitats that are regularly disturbed. Species communities in urban areas are far from equilibrium. Our analysis also suggests that urban communities need to be considered as being in constant change to adapt to disturbances and changes imposed by human activities.eng
dc.identifier.citationSattler T, et al. 2010. Spider, bee, and bird communities in cities are shaped by environmental control and high stochasticity. Ecology 91, 3343-3353.eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10355/66943
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.publisherWiley on behalf of the Ecological Society of Americaeng
dc.relation.ispartofcollectionUrban Biodiversity Research Coordination Network (UrBioNet) (MU)eng
dc.subjectUrban Ecologyeng
dc.subjectNativeeng
dc.subjectExoticeng
dc.subjectBiodiversityeng
dc.subject.lcshBirdseng
dc.titleBird data : Switzerland, Luganoeng
dc.title.alternativeSpider, bee, and bird communities in cities are shaped by environmental control and high stochasticityeng
dc.typeDataseteng


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record