[-] Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPlain, Ronald L.eng
dc.contributor.authorGrimes, Glenneng
dc.date.issued2003-05eng
dc.descriptionThis revision is dated May 23, 2003.eng
dc.description.abstractThe 2002 Farm Bill contained a controversial provision mandating country of origin labeling (COOL) of certain unprocessed foods (beef, pork, lamb, fish, seafood, peanuts, fruits and vegetables) sold through non-small grocery stores (i.e. stores which annually sell more than $230,000 of fruits and vegetables) beginning on September 30, 2004. The basic concept of COOL appears to be popular with consumers. Much of the controversy about COOL arises from concerns that many in the livestock-red meat industry have that COOL will be a costly regulation with little or no benefit for their sector. It is not the purpose of this paper to enter into the discussion of how accurate and verifiable, and therefore how costly and burdensome, the COOL record keeping requirements should be.eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10355/8963eng
dc.languageEnglisheng
dc.relation.ispartofcollectionAgricultural Economics publications (MU)eng
dc.relation.ispartofcommunityUniversity of Missouri-Columbia. College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources. Division of Applied Social Sciences. Department of Agricultural Economicseng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDepartment of Agricultural Economics working paper ; no. AEWP 2003-03eng
dc.source.harvestedhttp://dass.missouri.edu/agecon/research/workingpapers/aewp2003-3.pdfeng
dc.subjectU.S. pork industryeng
dc.subject.lcshFood -- Labeling -- Law and legislationeng
dc.subject.lcshAnimal industry -- Law and legislationeng
dc.subject.lcshAgricultural laws and legislationeng
dc.titleBenefits of COOL to the Swine Industryeng
dc.typeWorking Papereng


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[-] Show simple item record