Shared more. Cited more. Safe forever.
    • advanced search
    • submit works
    • about
    • help
    • contact us
    • login
    View Item 
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • Graduate School - MU Theses and Dissertations (MU)
    • Theses and Dissertations (MU)
    • Dissertations (MU)
    • 2008 Dissertations (MU)
    • 2008 MU dissertations - Freely available online
    • View Item
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • Graduate School - MU Theses and Dissertations (MU)
    • Theses and Dissertations (MU)
    • Dissertations (MU)
    • 2008 Dissertations (MU)
    • 2008 MU dissertations - Freely available online
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    advanced searchsubmit worksabouthelpcontact us

    Browse

    All of MOspaceCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis SemesterThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis Semester

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular AuthorsStatistics by Referrer

    In Sullivan's shadow : the use and abuse of libel law during the Civil Rights Movement

    Edmondson, Aimee
    View/Open
    [PDF] public.pdf (2.056Kb)
    [PDF] short.pdf (5.294Kb)
    [PDF] research.pdf (972.2Kb)
    Date
    2008
    Format
    Thesis
    Metadata
    [+] Show full item record
    Abstract
    This is a study of libel cases filed by southern public officials during the Civil Rights Movement relating to African Americans' increasing fight for equality in the United States. Emphasis is on little-known lawsuits filed in the shadow of the landmark New York Times. v. Sullivan case in Alabama in 1960, through its adjudication in 1964 and in its aftermath. This study expands upon the evidence and argument that southern officials used existing laws to craft what amounted to a sedition law in order to stop the press from covering the movement. Without the world looking at the South through the lens of the national press, southern officials and other segregationists would have been free to continue to squelch activism in their own way. Shattering precedent, the nation's high court constitutionalized libel law with the Sullivan decision, creating a new standard that required public officials to prove "actual malice" and insuring that citizens were free to exercise their First Amendment right to criticize the government. This study illustrates that the use and abuse of libel law became an integral part of the story in the battle for equal rights.
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/10355/9098
    https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/9098
    Degree
    Ph. D.
    Thesis Department
    Journalism (MU)
    Rights
    OpenAccess.
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
    Collections
    • 2008 MU dissertations - Freely available online
    • Journalism electronic theses and dissertations (MU)

    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems
     

     


    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems