Immediate versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with non-ST elevation-acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomised trials [abstract]

MOspace/Manakin Repository

Breadcrumbs Navigation

Immediate versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with non-ST elevation-acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomised trials [abstract]

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/9326

[+] show full item record


Title: Immediate versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with non-ST elevation-acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomised trials [abstract]
Author: Rajpurohit, Naveen; Garg, Nadish; Choudhary, Abhishek
Keywords: heart attack
mortality benefit
Date: 2010-11-11
Abstract: Studies have indicated that an early invasive strategy is favorable over a selective invasive strategy for Non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). However, there is no general consensus on precisely how early should the revascularization be performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed to compare the outcomes of revascularization less than 24 hours of presentation (Group A) versus greater than 24 hours of presentation (Group B) for NSTE-ACS have shown conflicting results. Based on a systematic search seven RCTs (13,762 patients) comparing the composite of death and myocardial infarctions (MI) within 30 days of revascularization were included. The effects of both methods were analyzed by calculating pooled estimates for composite of death and MI, death, MI and revascularization.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10355/9326

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

[+] show full item record