Shared more. Cited more. Safe forever.
    • advanced search
    • submit works
    • about
    • help
    • contact us
    • login
    View Item 
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • Graduate School - MU Theses and Dissertations (MU)
    • Theses and Dissertations (MU)
    • Dissertations (MU)
    • 2022 Dissertations (MU)
    • 2022 MU Dissertations - Freely available online
    • View Item
    •   MOspace Home
    • University of Missouri-Columbia
    • Graduate School - MU Theses and Dissertations (MU)
    • Theses and Dissertations (MU)
    • Dissertations (MU)
    • 2022 Dissertations (MU)
    • 2022 MU Dissertations - Freely available online
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    advanced searchsubmit worksabouthelpcontact us

    Browse

    All of MOspaceCommunities & CollectionsDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis SemesterThis CollectionDate IssuedAuthor/ContributorTitleIdentifierThesis DepartmentThesis AdvisorThesis Semester

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular AuthorsStatistics by Referrer

    How teachers design curriculum units: a case study of algebra teachers' instructional decision-making processes and products

    Han, Jaepil
    View/Open
    [PDF] HanJaepilResearch.pdf (4.594Mb)
    Date
    2022
    Format
    Thesis
    Metadata
    [+] Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study examined how algebra teachers plan curriculum units when they actively design their curriculum. I used a case study (Yin, 2013) of five experienced high school mathematics teachers who came from school districts of varying sizes across the nation. More specifically, I analyzed the teachers' unit planning processes and products by applying a participatory relationship perspective between teacher and curriculum (Remillard, 2005). I found that the teachers' unit planning was a cyclical and ongoing process, which occurred not just before the unit began but also while the unit was underway and even after the unit ended. Curriculum units were the unit of planning for most teachers. A unit schedule was the most common element of the document that the teachers created during their unit planning. The teachers examined the importance of their unit components (e.g., concepts, problems, warm-ups, reviews) and made decisions based on not only the component's importance to students' mathematics learning but also student progress towards the desired learning goals. Interestingly, time constraints did not influence the teachers' plans on assessments but only their plans on lessons and pacing. The findings from this study urge future research efforts to specify differences within each of the seven unit planning practices and investigate the relationship between them. This study also provides a valuable framework for developing preservice and in-service teachers' pedagogical design capacities.
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/10355/93962
    https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/93962
    Degree
    Ph. D.
    Thesis Department
    Learning, Teaching and Curriculum/Mathematics Education (MU)
    Collections
    • Learning, Teaching and Curriculum electronic theses and dissertations (MU)
    • 2022 MU Dissertations - Freely available online

    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems
     

     


    Send Feedback
    hosted by University of Missouri Library Systems